Medichecks General health & wellness

Chlamydia and Gonorrhoea Urine Test

This urine test checks for chlamydia and gonorrhoea, two common STIs, in people without symptoms. It suits people wanting a discreet check; those with symptoms should visit a sexual health clinic instead.

  • At-home test
  • Doctor reviewed
Sample
Urine
Collection
In-store clinic
Results in
4 days
Biomarkers
2
Doctor reviewed
Yes
Tests for
  • C trachomatis PCR
  • N gonorrhoeae NAAT

Test specifications

Provider
Medichecks
Sample type
urine
Collection method
in-store clinic
Turnaround time
4 days
Biomarkers tested
2
At-home test
Yes
Doctor reviewed
Yes
Gender focus
Both

What's tested

2 biomarkers as listed by Medichecks.

Infection

  • C trachomatis PCR
  • N gonorrhoeae NAAT

About this test

This urine test checks for two common sexually transmitted infections, chlamydia and gonorrhoea, using PCR and NAAT methods. It's designed for people without symptoms who want a discreet check, rather than for diagnosing or treating an active infection with symptoms.

With two biomarkers, it places towards the low end for depth among the general wellness tests we track. On price, at £59 it costs well below the typical general wellness test of similar size in our tracking.

The listing is clear about what you're buying: it sets out the biomarkers, sample type, turnaround and collection options up front, though it doesn't describe the report format. Trust signals score highly too, reflecting Medichecks' 4.5 Trustpilot rating (over 2,400 reviews), UKAS ISO 15189 accredited partner labs, doctor review as standard, and a track record stretching back to 2001. You will, however, need to attend the provider's Inuvi Clinic in London in person to give your sample, since it cannot be posted.

Who is it for?

This test suits you if you have no symptoms and want a discreet check for chlamydia and gonorrhoea, and you're able to attend Inuvi Clinic in London in person. The provider is clear that if you do have symptoms of an STI, you should visit your nearest sexual health clinic instead, as you may need prompt treatment.

Because the sample cannot be posted, it will not suit you if you need a fully remote or postal test; look elsewhere in our listings for that.

How it works

You need to visit the provider's Inuvi Clinic in London in person to give a urine sample, as it cannot be posted. The lab tests the sample for chlamydia (PCR) and gonorrhoea (NAAT), and a doctor reviews the result before your report is sent, typically within 4 days.

Pros & cons

Pros

  • Covers two common STIs (chlamydia and gonorrhoea) in one urine test.
  • A doctor reviews your results before your report is sent, at no extra cost.
  • At £59, it's priced well below the typical general wellness test of similar size we track.

Cons

  • Must be collected in person at Inuvi Clinic in London; the sample cannot be posted.
  • Not intended for people who already have STI symptoms; a sexual health clinic is advised instead.
  • Checks two infections only, not a wider sexual health panel.

Our editorial score

Compare Health Test Score Two-marker STI urine test, clinic visit only
Editorial confidence: 10.0/10

This urine test checks for chlamydia and gonorrhoea for £59, but you will need to attend the provider's Inuvi Clinic in London in person, as the sample cannot be posted. Against other general wellness tests of similar size that we track, it is priced well below the typical cost, though it is not suitable if you already have symptoms.

Score breakdown

  • Clarity and documentation 8.0/10

    The listing publishes a short description, the full biomarker list, a stated turnaround, clear collection options, the sample type; it does not state what the report looks like.

  • Clinical depth 5.6/10

    2 biomarkers, placing it in the 19th percentile of general wellness tests we track.

  • Collection convenience 7.0/10

    A urine sample you take at home, no needle; results in around 4 days, slower than similar tests.

  • Results and follow-up 7.0/10

    Results are reviewed by a doctor; the provider does not describe the report format.

  • Trust signals 9.5/10

    Trustpilot 4.5 from 2,477 reviews; accredited lab (UKAS ISO 15189 partner labs); doctor review as standard; trading 25+ years.

  • Value for money 9.3/10

    £59.00 against a median of £135.00 for the 19 similarly sized general wellness tests we track (-56%).

Calculated 13 September 2026 from the facts we hold about this test and provider, using our published scoring formula. Scores are not hand-edited.

More in General health & wellness

View all →
Medichecks

Health and Lifestyle Blood Test

19-marker health check, priced above some 20-marker rivals

A 19-marker blood test covering cholesterol, liver and kidney function, inflammation and key vitamins, aimed at general health screening or tracking the effect of diet and exercise changes. Includes an at-home finger-prick option.

  • At-home test
8.6 / 10
£89.00
Full review →
Medichecks

Essential Blood Test

Cheapest test in its 26-50 marker comparison group

This blood test covers 38 markers across cholesterol, blood sugar, iron, kidney and liver function, key proteins, and full blood count, giving a broad snapshot of general health. It suits people who want a wide baseline health check rather than looking at one specific concern.

8.5 / 10
£89.00
Full review →
Blue Horizon Medicals

Fingerprick Wellwoman

Broad women's health panel priced below its group median

A general blood health check for women covering cholesterol, liver, kidney, thyroid, diabetes and iron status, plus an added Ca125 marker. It suits women wanting a broad baseline check rather than a single-marker test.

  • At-home test
8.5 / 10
£82.25
Full review →
Blue Horizon Medicals

Fingerprick Wellman

20-marker men's health panel priced below the group median

A general blood health check for men covering cholesterol, liver, kidney, thyroid, diabetes and iron status, plus an added PSA marker. It suits men wanting a broad baseline health check rather than a single-marker test.

  • At-home test
8.5 / 10
£82.25
Full review →